Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Reade Date: Dec 5, 2012 11:12am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Phil's E72 Quote

It *is* difficult (or impossible) to play in Jerry's shadow which is why I've never understood why they don't tear a page from his playbook and explore other musical avenues with their outside pursuits.

When Jerry teamed with others the very point was to depart from GD music, and often in bold, adventurous ways. I mean he didn't get with Howard Wales to 'reinterpret' Friend of the Devil. The Old and In the Way thing was to explore an entirely different genre of music, and one very difficult to play. He was pushing himself and growing with his outside ventures. The early JGB lineups featured Merl Saunders of course, who Garcia credited late in his life with teaching him more about music than anybody! The acoustic 1987 JGB and his collaboration with Grisman in the early nineties were strict acoustic adventures though not bluegrass so again, a different genre.

He wasn't passing time with these endeavors (or worse, making cracks about how he needed the extra coin to send his kids to college). They were intentional efforts at musical growth. It's this very example he set that makes his bandmates efforts without him since '95 so hollow.



Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jerlouvis Date: Dec 5, 2012 2:30pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Phil's E72 Quote

I don't think Bob or Phil had the creative drive or desire to branch out as much as Jerry did,while Bob had a number of side projects over the years and Phil had the bar band he played a few gigs with during the hiatus their main creative avenue was the GD.

In fairness to Bob and Phil while Jerry was alive there was always a GD,so he was never faced with a situation where he didn't have that outlet to play the GD catalog,so he could focus his outside energies exploring a variety of different styles and music.Presented with a scenario of no GD,I would assume he would still have wanted to perform some of his GD compositions.I think he would have been more successful at puling that off.

As usual UJ52 you come through with the goods.A nice explanation on the definition of the term pitch,tied into why it matters not in relation to Phil's ability to sing or lack thereof,plus a funny and somewhat true comparison to what his vocal sounded like "sheep bleating".

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Reade Date: Dec 5, 2012 3:27pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Phil's E72 Quote

While many variables apparently go into whether or not a guy can carry a tune, as UJ52 points out, there has got to be at least some disconnect- or irony at least -involved with a guy who can correctly identify any note played by any instrument at any time (very rare ability as UJ52 also points out) but not be able to hear himself sounding like a farm animal.
To paraphrase Mick, I'm no schoolboy (when it cones to these musical terms) but I know what I hear.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jerlouvis Date: Dec 5, 2012 4:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Phil's E72 Quote

Good point,both funny and ironic.